<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sick and Tired of Ill-informed Tech &#8220;Journalists&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ubernoggin.com/archives/247/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/247</link>
	<description>Intellagirl&#039;s Geeky Thoughts and Ponderings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hollins</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/247/comment-page-1#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hollins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=247#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>Yes`Sarah, 

These kids with these new found technologies, nothing wrong with chalk, slate and a good old beating with a stiff cane, Then they would learn wouldn&#039;t they.....
Perhaps we should chain them to their desks then they would listen...

He said with no Irony............

(Playing with my new uber-cool mac)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes`Sarah, </p>
<p>These kids with these new found technologies, nothing wrong with chalk, slate and a good old beating with a stiff cane, Then they would learn wouldn&#8217;t they&#8230;..<br />
Perhaps we should chain them to their desks then they would listen&#8230;</p>
<p>He said with no Irony&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>(Playing with my new uber-cool mac)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muffy St. Bernard</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/247/comment-page-1#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>Muffy St. Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=247#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>These kids today, with their fast cars and their rumble seats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These kids today, with their fast cars and their rumble seats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoria</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/247/comment-page-1#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=247#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris/Topher Zwiers</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/247/comment-page-1#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris/Topher Zwiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=247#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>Sarah,

I&#039;ve experienced the exact same frustration with &quot;journalists&quot; that provide an &quot;overview&quot; and &quot;informed opinion&quot; to their readers regarding a new technology.  There have been a number of instances of real hack jobs by journalists that, as you describe, really have no clue regarding the technology about which they&#039;re writing.  I think those do need to be highlighted and &quot;called out.&quot;

But, after reading Haimoff&#039;s article, I don&#039;t think she falls into that category.  She concludes with what I read as a somewhat positive spin on social communication technologies - Facebook or otherwise:
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;And it turns out that reading that my business partner Dave is watching the largest raindrops he&#039;s ever seen fall out of the sky, or that my friend&#039;s little sister is excited about seeing her boyfriend tomorrow, or that my college roommate is reevaluating life makes me feel less alone too.  Even if just for an Internet minute. &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
The way the article ends, to me seems to suggest that readers that question technologies like Twitter or Facebook - the notion of posting status messages of what you&#039;re doing at the moment - should perhaps think twice.  She did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve experienced the exact same frustration with &#8220;journalists&#8221; that provide an &#8220;overview&#8221; and &#8220;informed opinion&#8221; to their readers regarding a new technology.  There have been a number of instances of real hack jobs by journalists that, as you describe, really have no clue regarding the technology about which they&#8217;re writing.  I think those do need to be highlighted and &#8220;called out.&#8221;</p>
<p>But, after reading Haimoff&#8217;s article, I don&#8217;t think she falls into that category.  She concludes with what I read as a somewhat positive spin on social communication technologies &#8211; Facebook or otherwise:</p>
<blockquote><p>And it turns out that reading that my business partner Dave is watching the largest raindrops he&#8217;s ever seen fall out of the sky, or that my friend&#8217;s little sister is excited about seeing her boyfriend tomorrow, or that my college roommate is reevaluating life makes me feel less alone too.  Even if just for an Internet minute. </p></blockquote>
<p>The way the article ends, to me seems to suggest that readers that question technologies like Twitter or Facebook &#8211; the notion of posting status messages of what you&#8217;re doing at the moment &#8211; should perhaps think twice.  She did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

