<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sidewiki: Brilliant or Evil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ubernoggin.com/archives/481/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/481</link>
	<description>Intellagirl&#039;s Geeky Thoughts and Ponderings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:19:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NetherNet Redux? Google Sidewiki &#171; Electric Archaeology: Digital Media for Learning and Research</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/481/comment-page-1#comment-5081</link>
		<dc:creator>NetherNet Redux? Google Sidewiki &#171; Electric Archaeology: Digital Media for Learning and Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=481#comment-5081</guid>
		<description>[...] over at Ubernoggin, I see that the Googlemonster is allowing folks to annotate websites. There&#8217;s potential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at Ubernoggin, I see that the Googlemonster is allowing folks to annotate websites. There&#8217;s potential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Houssian</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/481/comment-page-1#comment-4983</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Houssian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=481#comment-4983</guid>
		<description>Well as mentioned this is certainly not new, but I&#039;m certain that the installed user base of Google is many, many times larger than previous attempts, giving it a much likelier chance at making a difference.  Now imagine taking all the tweets (or other open social network chatter) about a certain site and having them dynamically associated with the sidewiki.... powerful.  Essentially what I think will happen is people will lose (even more) control over their presence online, really forcing people to change the way we view things online, and what we&#039;re willing to put online.  While I think it will encourage a lot of good changes, it could also be very distopian (sp?) as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as mentioned this is certainly not new, but I&#8217;m certain that the installed user base of Google is many, many times larger than previous attempts, giving it a much likelier chance at making a difference.  Now imagine taking all the tweets (or other open social network chatter) about a certain site and having them dynamically associated with the sidewiki&#8230;. powerful.  Essentially what I think will happen is people will lose (even more) control over their presence online, really forcing people to change the way we view things online, and what we&#8217;re willing to put online.  While I think it will encourage a lot of good changes, it could also be very distopian (sp?) as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmduke</title>
		<link>http://ubernoggin.com/archives/481/comment-page-1#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>cmduke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubernoggin.com/?p=481#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>My reaction was mixed.  It could become a more widely adopted practice with the Google tool, but it&#039;s nothing new really.  Diigo&#039;s offered that feature plus some for two years plus? and that only extends to my familiarity with Diigo; it may be longer than that.

-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My reaction was mixed.  It could become a more widely adopted practice with the Google tool, but it&#8217;s nothing new really.  Diigo&#8217;s offered that feature plus some for two years plus? and that only extends to my familiarity with Diigo; it may be longer than that.</p>
<p>-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
